CaliforniaSchoolsReyburn Intermediate

Reyburn Intermediate

PublicRegularDarajooyinka 78
Clovis, California · Clovis Unified
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Ardayda 1,785
ST ratio 23.5:1
FRL56%
Title INo
Performance

Reyburn Intermediate — Academic Performance

Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Reyburn Intermediate in Clovis, California.

Headline Indicator
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
44%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
18%
Exceeded the standard
837
Students tested
GradeMet or exceededExceededTested
Grade 844%18%837
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematicsScience
All students
65%
1,740 tested
47%
1,720 tested
44%
837 tested
Gender
Female
72%
883 tested
45%
876 tested
44%
424 tested
Male
58%
855 tested
49%
842 tested
45%
411 tested
Race and ethnicity
Asian
72%
444 tested
54%
451 tested
53%
224 tested
Black or African American
47%
66 tested
23%
64 tested
21%
33 tested
Filipino
85%
54 tested
70%
54 tested
62%
34 tested
Hispanic or Latino
57%
735 tested
35%
716 tested
33%
337 tested
White
74%
358 tested
61%
353 tested
57%
168 tested
Two or more races
66%
68 tested
57%
67 tested
49%
35 tested
Socioeconomic status
Economically disadvantaged
57%
929 tested
36%
912 tested
34%
455 tested
Not economically disadvantaged
75%
811 tested
59%
808 tested
57%
382 tested
Military family
63%
65 tested
38%
65 tested
25%
24 tested
English learners
English learners
8%
60 tested
6%
67 tested
3%
37 tested
English learners, 12 months or more
6%
49 tested
4%
47 tested
4%
26 tested
English learners, under 12 months
18%
11 tested
10%
20 tested
0%
11 tested
Long term English learners
17%
23 tested
5%
21 tested
-
Reclassified fluent English proficient
72%
286 tested
46%
280 tested
50%
147 tested
Initial fluent English proficient
86%
70 tested
70%
69 tested
73%
30 tested
Ever an English learner
61%
346 tested
38%
347 tested
41%
184 tested
Never an English learner
67%
1,394 tested
49%
1,373 tested
45%
653 tested
English only
65%
1,324 tested
48%
1,304 tested
44%
623 tested
Disability
Students with disabilities
12%
154 tested
7%
149 tested
9%
77 tested
No reported disability
71%
1,586 tested
51%
1,571 tested
48%
760 tested
Parent education
Parent not a high school graduate
45%
76 tested
20%
75 tested
31%
39 tested
Parent high school graduate
55%
327 tested
37%
321 tested
36%
160 tested
Parent some college
60%
407 tested
39%
403 tested
40%
186 tested
Parent college graduate
70%
576 tested
54%
566 tested
48%
289 tested
Parent graduate school
81%
315 tested
62%
314 tested
60%
141 tested
View 18 further student groups reported by the state
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematicsScience
Not homeless
66%
1,737 tested
47%
1,717 tested
45%
835 tested
Not migrant education
65%
1,737 tested
47%
1,717 tested
44%
837 tested
Not foster youth
66%
1,735 tested
47%
1,715 tested
45%
833 tested
Fluent English proficient and English only
67%
1,680 tested
49%
1,653 tested
46%
800 tested
Not armed forces family member
65%
1,675 tested
47%
1,655 tested
45%
813 tested
Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged)
48%
424 tested
25%
409 tested
23%
214 tested
Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged)
70%
311 tested
48%
307 tested
50%
123 tested
Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged)
70%
303 tested
50%
308 tested
50%
145 tested
White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged)
79%
243 tested
69%
242 tested
64%
116 tested
Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged)
77%
141 tested
62%
143 tested
58%
79 tested
White (Econ. Disadvantaged)
63%
115 tested
45%
111 tested
40%
52 tested
Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged)
83%
41 tested
76%
41 tested
67%
18 tested
Parent education declined to state
54%
39 tested
29%
41 tested
27%
22 tested
Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged)
93%
40 tested
78%
40 tested
69%
26 tested
Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged)
41%
37 tested
14%
35 tested
19%
16 tested
Black or African American (Not Econ. Disadvantaged)
55%
29 tested
34%
29 tested
24%
17 tested
Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged)
41%
27 tested
27%
26 tested
29%
17 tested
Filipino (Econ. Disadvantaged)
64%
14 tested
50%
14 tested
-
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
30%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
58%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
102
English learners tested
GradeTestedLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 3 or 4
Grade 76116%20%20%44%64%
Grade 84129%22%39%10%49%
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (21 groups)
Student groupTestedLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 3 or 4
Economically Disadvantaged8621%21%28%30%58%
No Special Education Services8421%18%29%32%61%
ELs enrolled 12 months or more8215%17%30%38%68%
Male6123%23%31%23%54%
EL - 6+ years in program557%15%29%49%78%
Asian5426%22%28%24%52%
Female4120%17%22%41%63%
Hispanic or Latino3918%21%23%38%62%
Primary language: Spanish3818%18%24%39%63%
LTEL2313%26%26%35%61%
EL - less than 1 year in program2050%35%15%0%15%
ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months2050%35%15%0%15%
Primary language: All remaining languages1942%32%16%11%26%
Special Education Services1822%33%22%22%44%
Primary language: Hmong170%6%35%59%94%
Primary language: Punjabi1729%24%41%6%47%
Not Economically Disadvantaged1625%19%25%31%56%
EL - 1 year in program10-----
EL - 2 years in program9-----
Primary language: Arabic5-----
White4-----
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.