Performance
Graystone Elementary — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Graystone Elementary in San Jose, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
70%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
35%
Exceeded the standard
80
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 70% | 35% | 80 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 78% 247 tested | 81% 252 tested | 70% 80 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 83% 118 tested | 80% 120 tested | 77% 48 tested |
| Male | 74% 129 tested | 81% 132 tested | 59% 32 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 86% 127 tested | 94% 130 tested | 71% 45 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino | 68% 31 tested | 56% 32 tested | - |
| White | 67% 70 tested | 66% 71 tested | 68% 19 tested |
| Two or more races | 77% 13 tested | 85% 13 tested | - |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 50% 24 tested | 42% 24 tested | - |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 81% 223 tested | 85% 228 tested | 74% 72 tested |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 19% 21 tested | 64% 25 tested | - |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 20% 20 tested | 60% 20 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 81% 26 tested | 81% 26 tested | 50% 12 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 84% 51 tested | 88% 51 tested | 77% 22 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 53% 47 tested | 73% 51 tested | 50% 12 tested |
| Never an English learner | 84% 200 tested | 83% 201 tested | 74% 68 tested |
| English only | 84% 149 tested | 81% 150 tested | 72% 46 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 32% 22 tested | 22% 23 tested | - |
| No reported disability | 83% 225 tested | 86% 229 tested | 76% 74 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent some college | 77% 13 tested | 54% 13 tested | - |
| Parent college graduate | 66% 68 tested | 71% 72 tested | 63% 19 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 84% 156 tested | 89% 157 tested | 74% 50 tested |
View 9 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not armed forces family member | 78% 247 tested | 81% 252 tested | 70% 80 tested |
| Not foster youth | 78% 247 tested | 81% 252 tested | 70% 80 tested |
| Not homeless | 78% 247 tested | 81% 252 tested | 70% 80 tested |
| Not migrant education | 78% 247 tested | 81% 252 tested | 70% 80 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 84% 226 tested | 82% 227 tested | 70% 80 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 86% 123 tested | 94% 126 tested | 74% 42 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 70% 61 tested | 68% 62 tested | 65% 17 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 78% 23 tested | 75% 24 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 82% 11 tested | 91% 11 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
25%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
63%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
52
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 13 | 8% | 8% | 31% | 54% | 85% |
| Grade 1 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 2 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 3 | 14 | 7% | 64% | 21% | 7% | 29% |
| Grade 4 | 12 | 8% | 8% | 50% | 33% | 83% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (22 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 43 | 14% | 21% | 40% | 26% | 65% |
| No Special Education Services | 41 | 5% | 24% | 39% | 32% | 71% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 37 | 11% | 24% | 38% | 27% | 65% |
| Male | 36 | 8% | 31% | 39% | 22% | 61% |
| Asian | 30 | 13% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 63% |
| Female | 16 | 19% | 13% | 38% | 31% | 69% |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 16 | 19% | 25% | 44% | 13% | 56% |
| White | 16 | 13% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 63% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 15 | 13% | 27% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 15 | 13% | 27% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 14 | 7% | 29% | 21% | 43% | 64% |
| Primary language: Korean | 11 | 9% | 18% | 36% | 36% | 73% |
| Special Education Services | 11 | 36% | 27% | 36% | 0% | 36% |
| Primary language: Mandarin (Putonghua) | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 2 years in program | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 4 years in program | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Arabic | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Spanish | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 3 years in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.