Performance
Summerwind Trails — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Summerwind Trails in Calimesa, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Performance data not yet captured
State assessment proficiency and outcome data for this school has not been ingested yet. Check back as the EDFacts and state datasets refresh.
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
31%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
13%
Exceeded the standard
258
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 21% | 8% | 128 |
| Grade 8 | 42% | 18% | 130 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 57% 740 tested | 41% 737 tested | 31% 258 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 59% 364 tested | 37% 363 tested | 25% 130 tested |
| Male | 56% 376 tested | 46% 374 tested | 38% 128 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 76% 33 tested | 67% 33 tested | 54% 13 tested |
| Black or African American | 54% 46 tested | 37% 46 tested | 21% 19 tested |
| Filipino | 70% 27 tested | 59% 27 tested | 55% 11 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino | 54% 396 tested | 36% 394 tested | 26% 140 tested |
| White | 62% 191 tested | 48% 190 tested | 41% 54 tested |
| Two or more races | 57% 42 tested | 36% 42 tested | 32% 19 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 52% 384 tested | 36% 382 tested | 22% 134 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 63% 356 tested | 47% 355 tested | 42% 124 tested |
| Homeless | 44% 18 tested | 50% 18 tested | - |
| Military family | 45% 53 tested | 37% 52 tested | 21% 14 tested |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 8% 25 tested | 20% 25 tested | 0% 12 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 4% 23 tested | 17% 23 tested | 0% 11 tested |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 76% 34 tested | 55% 33 tested | 50% 12 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 84% 19 tested | 74% 19 tested | - |
| Ever an English learner | 47% 59 tested | 40% 58 tested | 25% 24 tested |
| Never an English learner | 58% 681 tested | 41% 679 tested | 32% 234 tested |
| English only | 57% 662 tested | 40% 660 tested | 31% 228 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 20% 96 tested | 14% 96 tested | 7% 41 tested |
| No reported disability | 63% 644 tested | 45% 641 tested | 36% 217 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent high school graduate | 39% 72 tested | 21% 72 tested | 23% 30 tested |
| Parent some college | 51% 167 tested | 37% 166 tested | 24% 62 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 60% 303 tested | 43% 303 tested | 30% 102 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 67% 181 tested | 51% 179 tested | 45% 56 tested |
View 17 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not migrant education | 57% 740 tested | 41% 737 tested | 31% 258 tested |
| Not foster youth | 57% 738 tested | 41% 735 tested | 32% 257 tested |
| Not homeless | 58% 722 tested | 41% 719 tested | 32% 251 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 59% 715 tested | 42% 712 tested | 33% 246 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 58% 687 tested | 42% 685 tested | 32% 244 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 52% 252 tested | 33% 250 tested | 20% 90 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 58% 144 tested | 41% 144 tested | 36% 50 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 66% 133 tested | 52% 132 tested | 45% 38 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 52% 58 tested | 40% 58 tested | 31% 16 tested |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 54% 28 tested | 39% 28 tested | 17% 12 tested |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 70% 27 tested | 44% 27 tested | 46% 13 tested |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 62% 21 tested | 57% 21 tested | 55% 11 tested |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 70% 20 tested | 65% 20 tested | - |
| Black or African American (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 56% 18 tested | 33% 18 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 33% 15 tested | 20% 15 tested | - |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 85% 13 tested | 69% 13 tested | - |
| Parent education declined to state | 55% 11 tested | 55% 11 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
13%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
56%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
39
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 2 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 3 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 5 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 8 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (19 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 36 | 22% | 25% | 39% | 14% | 53% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 31 | 26% | 19% | 42% | 13% | 55% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 26 | 31% | 19% | 38% | 12% | 50% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 26 | 31% | 19% | 38% | 12% | 50% |
| No Special Education Services | 25 | 12% | 16% | 52% | 20% | 72% |
| Male | 24 | 25% | 25% | 38% | 13% | 50% |
| Female | 15 | 13% | 20% | 53% | 13% | 67% |
| Special Education Services | 14 | 36% | 36% | 29% | 0% | 29% |
| Asian | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 3 years in program | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 2 years in program | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| LTEL | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 1 year in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Homeless | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.