Performance
Solis Park — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Solis Park in Irvine, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Performance data not yet captured
State assessment proficiency and outcome data for this school has not been ingested yet. Check back as the EDFacts and state datasets refresh.
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
66%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
35%
Exceeded the standard
229
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 70% | 39% | 102 |
| Grade 8 | 62% | 31% | 127 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 71% 623 tested | 69% 650 tested | 66% 229 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 77% 288 tested | 69% 300 tested | 71% 119 tested |
| Male | 66% 335 tested | 69% 350 tested | 59% 110 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 76% 416 tested | 79% 444 tested | 68% 151 tested |
| Black or African American | 64% 11 tested | 27% 11 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 50% 58 tested | 42% 57 tested | 63% 19 tested |
| White | 65% 91 tested | 51% 91 tested | 51% 37 tested |
| Two or more races | 74% 35 tested | 60% 35 tested | 80% 15 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 59% 116 tested | 53% 119 tested | 48% 42 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 74% 507 tested | 73% 531 tested | 70% 187 tested |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 29% 90 tested | 53% 118 tested | 19% 43 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 29% 85 tested | 51% 85 tested | 23% 30 tested |
| English learners, under 12 months | - | 61% 33 tested | 8% 13 tested |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 87% 128 tested | 80% 128 tested | 83% 42 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 91% 106 tested | 83% 106 tested | 93% 40 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 63% 218 tested | 67% 246 tested | 51% 85 tested |
| Never an English learner | 76% 405 tested | 70% 404 tested | 74% 144 tested |
| English only | 70% 299 tested | 65% 298 tested | 67% 104 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 37% 54 tested | 33% 54 tested | 24% 17 tested |
| No reported disability | 74% 569 tested | 72% 596 tested | 69% 212 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent high school graduate | 43% 21 tested | 39% 23 tested | - |
| Parent some college | 42% 12 tested | 33% 12 tested | - |
| Parent college graduate | 58% 78 tested | 65% 96 tested | 38% 34 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 76% 100 tested | 87% 106 tested | 78% 41 tested |
View 13 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not foster youth | 71% 623 tested | 69% 650 tested | 66% 229 tested |
| Not homeless | 71% 623 tested | 69% 650 tested | 66% 229 tested |
| Not migrant education | 71% 623 tested | 69% 650 tested | 66% 229 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 71% 621 tested | 69% 648 tested | 66% 229 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 78% 533 tested | 73% 532 tested | 76% 186 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 75% 411 tested | 68% 412 tested | 72% 141 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 76% 347 tested | 80% 371 tested | 69% 126 tested |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 72% 69 tested | 73% 73 tested | 64% 25 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 70% 70 tested | 60% 70 tested | 59% 27 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 56% 43 tested | 47% 43 tested | 73% 15 tested |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 83% 29 tested | 69% 29 tested | 86% 14 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 48% 21 tested | 19% 21 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 33% 15 tested | 29% 14 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
25%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
56%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
186
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 25 | 16% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 64% |
| Grade 1 | 23 | 13% | 26% | 43% | 17% | 61% |
| Grade 2 | 18 | 17% | 28% | 44% | 11% | 56% |
| Grade 3 | 21 | 29% | 19% | 24% | 29% | 52% |
| Grade 4 | 19 | 37% | 21% | 16% | 26% | 42% |
| Grade 5 | 20 | 10% | 30% | 25% | 35% | 60% |
| Grade 6 | 16 | 19% | 31% | 31% | 19% | 50% |
| Grade 7 | 21 | 10% | 38% | 33% | 19% | 52% |
| Grade 8 | 23 | 26% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 65% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (27 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Special Education Services | 169 | 18% | 23% | 31% | 28% | 59% |
| Asian | 168 | 18% | 24% | 32% | 26% | 57% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 140 | 23% | 21% | 29% | 26% | 56% |
| Primary language: Mandarin (Putonghua) | 132 | 22% | 23% | 33% | 21% | 55% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 119 | 11% | 24% | 34% | 31% | 65% |
| Male | 109 | 21% | 24% | 33% | 22% | 55% |
| Female | 77 | 17% | 25% | 29% | 30% | 58% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 70 | 33% | 26% | 27% | 14% | 41% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 67 | 34% | 24% | 27% | 15% | 42% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 46 | 9% | 33% | 37% | 22% | 59% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 45 | 18% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 58% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 41 | 5% | 27% | 41% | 27% | 68% |
| Special Education Services | 17 | 35% | 35% | 29% | 0% | 29% |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 16 | 6% | 31% | 13% | 50% | 63% |
| Primary language: Korean | 15 | 20% | 13% | 27% | 40% | 67% |
| EL - 3 years in program | 12 | 17% | 17% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| Primary language: Cantonese | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| White | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 5 years in program | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 4 years in program | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Spanish | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| LTEL | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Arabic | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Russian | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.